Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Nsirim V. Amadi (2016) CLR 1(ZG) (SC)

Judgement delivered on January 22nd 2016

Brief

  • Jurisdiction – When can issue be raised and rules governing raising of
  • Jurisdiction – Meaning of
  • Respondent – Duty of in an appeal
  • Issues for Determination
  • Findings not appealed against – Effect of
  • Appeal – Steps to and guide to
  • Order 3 Rule 14(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2002
  • Order 3 Rule 14(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2002
  • Order 3 Rule 14(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules 2002

Facts

This is an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal Holden at Port Harcourt in appeal No.CA/PH/55/98 delivered on the 22nd day of April 2004 in which the Court allowed the appeal of the instant respondent in parts.

The respondent, as plaintiff instituted suit No.PHC/341/87 in the High Court of Rivers State, holden at Port Harcourt in which he claimed the following reliefs in the Statement of Claim:

  • 1.
    A declaration that the plaintiff who is the next of kin of Chief Christian O. Amadi (deceased) is entitled to the grant of letters of Administration in respect of the Plot 91 Gborokiri Layout, otherwise known as No.3 Andoni Street, Gborokiri, Port Harcourt.
  • 2.
    A declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to the Assignment of the leasehold interest in respect of Plot 91 Gborokiri Layout, otherwise known as No. 3 Andoni Street, Gborokiri, Port Harcourt.
  • 3.
    An order revoking and/or nullifying the Letters of Administration dated 15/2/82 purportedly granted to the Defendant in respect of the said Plot 91 Gborokiri Layout, otherwise known as No.3 Andoni Street, Gborokiri, Port Harcourt.
  • 4.
    An Order for the Defendant to account for all the rents he wrongly collected from the tenants in the premises from 23/4/80 (when his fathers interest in the property ceased to the date of judgment and payment of the same over to the estate of Chief Christian O. Amadi (deceased).
  • 5.
    An order of perpetual injunction to restrain the Defendant and/or his servants and agents from interfering with the said property."

The above claim of the present respondent is based on an assignment of the land in dispute to his late brother, Chief Christian Amadi.

The appellant, however contended that the property in issue was not assigned by his late father, late John Amabibi Nsirim and that the said late John Amabibi Nsirim granted a Power of Attorney to a donee over the said property thereby having nothing left to assign to the privy of the respondent and that the respondent not being armed with Letters of Administration at the time the suit was commenced but suing as the next of kin of his late father, lacked locus standi to institute the action.

Though the High Court granted relief No 2 supra; an order revoking and/or nullifying the letters of Administration dated 15/12/82; the Court gave Judgment to the defendant/appellant herein on the ground that his father having granted a Power of Attorney to another, had nothing left to assign to the brother of the plaintiff//respondent herein. The Court, however, failed to consider the issue of locus standi of the plaintiff/respondent to institute the action as raised by the defendant.

Dissatisfied with the above judgment, the present respondent appealed to the Court of Appeal, Holden at Port Harcourt which Court held, in the judgment delivered on the 22nd day of April, 2004, inter alia, as follows: "In conclusion, the appeal is allowed only in respect of paragraph 24(2) of the Statement of Claim. Accordingly I declare that the plaintiff is entitled to the assignment of the leasehold interest in respect of Plot 91 Gborokiri Layout, otherwise known as No.3 Andoni Street, Gborokiri Port Harcourt. He may therefore take the appropriate steps to have the assignment duly registered and also apply for a rectification of the Register of Title Deeds..."

Issues

  • Whether or not the learned Justices at the Court of Appeal were right in...
Read More